Daily Jang’s missing editorial on September 8, 2025, raises alarm over press freedom in Pakistan, highlighting censorship, self-censorship, and the silencing of critical editorial voices amid political and economic turmoil.
Courtesy: Taimoor Ul Hassan
WEBDESK — When Daily Jang appeared without an editorial on September 8, 2025, it raised alarm across Pakistan’s media landscape. The absence of an editorial — traditionally the institutional voice of a newspaper — has fueled debate over censorship and self-censorship in an environment where press freedom is already under pressure.
Editorials are often considered the conscience of a newspaper. Their silence, observers argue, speaks volumes about fear, power, and pressure. The last time such a void drew public attention was in 1953, when Dawn left its editorial blank in protest. During Gen. Zia-ul-Haq’s era, blank spaces became familiar reminders of the censors’ hand.
Analysts say Jang’s silence could mean one of two things: either the paper was directly pressured into silence, or it preemptively withheld its voice to avoid confrontation. Both possibilities, critics argue, are troubling.
“If pressure came from outside, it underscores the state’s intolerance of dissent. If it was self-imposed, it shows how deeply fear has been internalized by institutions that once prided themselves on defiance,” one analyst said.
Globally, editorial suppression is a hallmark of authoritarian systems, from China’s Southern Weekly to Russia’s state-managed media. Pakistan’s case, however, is more subtle, with censorship often unacknowledged and compliance quietly practiced.
Media observers warn that silence is not neutral but a form of complicity. At a time of political and economic turmoil, they argue, the public needs strong editorial voices — not missing ones.
American Dollar Exchange Rate